Carbon dating petrified wood www virtualdatings com
A coalified stump found in the Upper Permian coal bed in Sydney, Australia was assigned an age of 250 million years according to the geologic column.
It carbon dated to an uncorrected 'age' of 33,700 ± 400 years BP. Chaffin (El Cajon, California: Institute for Creation Research, and Chino Valley, Arizona: Creation Research Society, 2005), pp. Diamonds are the the hardest known naturally occurring substance and the chemical construction make them highly resistant to contamination.
Here are some specific results along this line; many more could be cited.
These were taken from a conference in 2012Fossils, coal, oil, natural gas, limestone, marble, and graphite from every Flood-related rock layer—and even some pre-Flood deposits—have all contained measurable quantities of radiocarbon.
Any loss of carbon-14 during fossilization or from exposure over the years would cause the sample to carbon date to an older age.
In permineralization the minerals fill in the empty spaces to form a fossil, but in petrification the minerals completely replace the original cellular material and the C.
Ten coal samples from Eocene, Cretaceous, and Pennsylvanian geological formations that supposedly formed 40 million to 300 million years ago. Significant levels of carbon-14 found inside diamonds indicate they have an uncorrected 'age' of 55,000 years BP.
They carbon dated to uncorrected 'ages' ranging from 48,000 to 50,000 years BP. Diamonds supposedly formed 1 to 2 billion years ago deep inside the earth, but since they contain carbon-14 that means they must be less than 60,000 years old.
The pre-Flood world contained much more plant life (as seen in massive coal seams). Evidence from ancient pottery and lava flows indicate the magnetic field was stronger in the past.By measuring the C14/C12 ratio, one can get an estimate of the age for the date of a once living object or a fossil, assuming that the production of C14 and its decay rate have been constant in the past.These estimates are roughly correct for historic time, that is, the past several thousand years.If decay rates were faster in the past, then even the C14 dates could be too old.Carbon 14 is an isotope of carbon with two extra neutrons in the nucleus. The rate at which this happens varies to some extent.
This is still a large number of C14 atoms, and they had to come from somewhere!